Aims and Scope

Journal of Engineering and Management studies (JENAMS) is a peer-reviewed bimonthly released journal that provides an international forum for disseminating the latest original research, Practical/Theoretical studies and application-based studies/reports and achievements in many areas of engineering. This Journal is also interested in different studies and research in Management science even for engineering or business.


The Journal of  Engineering and Management studies publishes articles in the following fields:


  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Construction Engineering
  • Civil Engineering
  • Computer Systems Engineering
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Manufacture Engineering 
  • Material Engineering
  • Mining and Geological Engineering
  • Nanotechnology Engineering
  • Oil and Gas Engineering


Management Studies Fields:


  • Project Management
  • Business Management
  • Building Information Modelling (BIM)
  • Construction Management
  • Facilities and Assets Management
  • Health and Safety Management
  • Leadership Management
  • Risk Management

Publication Ethics Policy

Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure reliable & high-quality scientific research publications, public trust in scientific findings, and that researchers receive credit for their work & ideas.

All articles published by this journal are committed to publishing only original material, i.e., material that has neither been published elsewhere nor is under review elsewhere. Manuscripts that are found to have been plagiarized from a manuscript by other authors, whether published or unpublished, will incur a plagiarism penalty. The publishing decision is based on the recommendation of the journal’s reviewers. All authors submitting their works to the journal for publication as original articles attest that the submitting works represent their author’s contributions and have not been copied in whole or in part from other works. The Chief Editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.

If the authors have used the work and/or words of others, they have cited or quoted them appropriately. Copyright laws and norms should be adhered to. Plagiarism can take several forms, including promoting information from another article (of the same authors or a different author) with cosmetic alterations as a new paper; copying or paraphrasing major parts of another’s paper (without acknowledgement), and claiming results from research undertaken by another. Plagiarism, in any form, is unethical publication behaviour and must be avoided. In making this judgement, the Chief Editor may consult with additional editors or reviewers.



Peer Review Process

Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review-they offer authors free advice. Through the peer review process, manuscripts should become:

More robust: Peer reviewers may point out gaps in your paper that require more explanation or additional experiments.

Easier to read: If parts of your paper are difficult to understand, reviewers can tell you so that you can fix them.

More useful: Peer reviewers also consider the importance of your paper to others in your field. Of course, in addition to offering authors advice, another important purpose of peer review is to make sure that the manuscripts the journal eventually publishes are of high quality. If a journal publishes too many low-quality manuscripts, its reputation and number of readers will decline.

Your journal manuscript can be rejected if it:

    • Lacks proper structure
    • Lacks the necessary detail for readers to fully understand the authors’ analysis
    • Has no new science
    • Does not clearly explain which parts of the findings are new science, versus what was already known
    • Lacks up-to-date references
    • Contains theories, concepts, or conclusions that are not fully supported by its data, arguments, and information
    • Does not provide enough details about materials and methods to allow other scientists to repeat the experiment
    • Lacks clear descriptions or explanations of:
    • Hypotheses tested
    • The experimental design
    • Sample characteristics and descriptive statistics
    • Describes poor experimental design or faulty or insufficient statistical analysis
    • Has poor language quality



Data Fabrication & Falsification:

Submitted manuscripts that are found to have either fabricated or falsified experimental results, including the manipulation of images, will incur data fabrication and falsification penalty as follow:

    • Immediate rejection of the infringing manuscript.
    • Immediate rejection of every other manuscript submitted to any journal published by JENAMS by any of the authors of the infringing manuscript.
    • Prohibition against all of the authors for any new submissions to JENAMS, either individually or in combination with other authors of the infringing manuscript, as well as in combination with any other authors. This prohibition will be imposed for a minimum of 2 years.
    • Prohibition against all of the authors from serving on the Editorial Board of JENAMS.




The names, email addresses and other personal data entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal only and will not be made available for any other party or any other purpose.